Upland CPS Lawyer | Juvenile Dependency Attorney

Upland CPS Lawyer | Juvenile Dependency Attorney

Facing a CPS Investigation in Upland

Being contacted by Child Protective Services (CPS) can be one of the most frightening experiences a parent or guardian will ever face. Whether you have received a phone call from a social worker, learned that a report has been made against you, or are facing the possibility of your child being removed from your home, it is critical to act quickly to protect your parental rights and contact an Upland CPS Lawyer | Juvenile Dependency Attorney Families in Upland are generally served by San Bernardino County Children and Family Services (CFS), the agency responsible for investigating allegations of child abuse, child neglect, domestic violence, substance abuse, mental health concerns, and other issues that may result in a California juvenile dependency court case.

Why You Should Contact an Upland CPS Lawyer Immediately

If you are under investigation by CPS, one of the most important decisions you can make is to contact an experienced Upland CPS Lawyer immediately. Speaking with a Juvenile Dependency Attorney before meeting with CPS, allowing interviews, signing documents, or appearing in court can help you understand your legal rights, avoid common mistakes, and develop a strategy to protect your family. Early legal representation can often make a significant difference in how a CPS investigation or juvenile dependency case progresses.

Experienced Representation Throughout the Juvenile Dependency Process

At Shaw 3 Law Firm, we are committed to representing parents, legal guardians, and relatives throughout Upland and San Bernardino County in every stage of the California juvenile dependency process. Attorney Walter Shaw has successfully represented families in matters involving CPS investigations, emergency child removals, detention hearings, jurisdiction hearings, disposition hearings, family reunification, visitation disputes, relative placement, and Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 petitions. Every case receives a strategic and personalized approach focused on protecting the parent-child relationship and pursuing the best possible outcome.

Contact Shaw 3 Law Firm

If you or a loved one is facing a CPS investigation or juvenile dependency case in Upland, do not wait to seek experienced legal guidance. Contact Shaw 3 Law Firm today to speak with an experienced Upland CPS Lawyer and Juvenile Dependency Attorney dedicated to protecting your parental rights and helping your family move forward.

Why Parents in Upland Hire a CPS Lawyer?

CPS Investigations in Upland

When San Bernardino County Children and Family Services (CFS) begins investigating allegations involving a child, parents in Upland often find themselves facing one of the most stressful situations of their lives. A CPS investigation may be initiated after a report alleging child abuse, child neglect, domestic violence, substance abuse, mental health concerns, or failure to protect. Regardless of whether the allegations are true, exaggerated, or completely unfounded, every CPS investigation should be taken seriously because it can lead to court intervention and affect a parent’s custody and visitation rights. Retaining an experienced Upland CPS Lawyer early in the process can help protect your legal rights, explain your options, and provide guidance before making statements or decisions that could impact your case.

Emergency Child Removals

In more serious cases, CPS may determine that a child is at immediate risk and seek an emergency child removal from the home. Depending on the circumstances, the Department may remove a child with law enforcement assistance or request authorization from the juvenile court. If your child has been removed or CPS is threatening removal, immediate legal representation is critical. An experienced Juvenile Dependency Attorney can evaluate the allegations, challenge unnecessary removals, and advocate for alternatives that allow children to remain safely with their families whenever permitted by law.

Detention Hearings

After an emergency removal, the court generally conducts a detention hearing to determine whether the child should remain in protective custody while the case proceeds. This hearing is often the first opportunity for parents to challenge the Department’s recommendations, present evidence supporting the child’s safe return home, and request less restrictive alternatives. Because important decisions are made early in the case, having an experienced Upland CPS Attorney can significantly affect the direction of the dependency proceedings.

Representation in California Juvenile Dependency Court

If the case continues, it proceeds through the California Juvenile Dependency Court, where the court determines whether the allegations are legally supported and what services, visitation orders, or placement decisions are appropriate. At Shaw 3 Law Firm, we represent parents throughout Upland and San Bernardino County during CPS investigations, emergency child removals, detention hearings, jurisdiction hearings, disposition hearings, review hearings, family reunification, and every stage of the juvenile dependency process. Our goal is to protect your parental rights, preserve your relationship with your child, and pursue the strongest possible outcome for your family.

What is CPS in Upland?

San Bernardino County Children and Family Services (CFS)

In Upland, California, reports involving suspected child abuse or neglect are generally investigated by San Bernardino County Children and Family Services (CFS), the county agency responsible for protecting the safety and well-being of children. CFS serves as the local Child Protective Services (CPS) agency for families living in Upland and throughout San Bernardino County. The agency’s primary responsibility is to investigate reports of suspected child abuse, child neglect, abandonment, exploitation, or other circumstances that may place a child at risk of harm. While CFS is responsible for protecting children, it must also respect and balance the constitutional and legal rights of parents throughout the investigation and court process.

How a CPS Investigation Begins

A CPS case often begins when San Bernardino County CFS receives a referral from a mandatory reporter, such as a teacher, physician, nurse, therapist, counselor, law enforcement officer, or another professional who suspects a child may be at risk. Reports may also be made by relatives, neighbors, or members of the public. After receiving a referral, CFS evaluates the allegations to determine whether a formal CPS investigation is necessary. If an investigation is opened, a social worker may interview parents, children, relatives, teachers, medical providers, and other individuals, conduct a home visit, review records, and evaluate whether the child can safely remain in the home.

Common CPS Allegations

Many CPS investigations involve allegations of child neglect, including inadequate supervision, unsafe living conditions, medical neglect, educational neglect, or a parent’s inability to provide appropriate care. Other investigations may involve allegations of physical abuse, emotional abuse, sexual abuse, domestic violence, substance abuse, mental health concerns, or failure to protect. Every allegation is evaluated based on the facts of the individual case, and not every referral results in court intervention or the removal of a child.

When a CPS Case Goes to Juvenile Dependency Court

If San Bernardino County CFS believes a child is at substantial risk of harm, the Department may file a petition in California Juvenile Dependency Court requesting judicial oversight, protective orders, family reunification services, or, in some cases, the temporary removal of the child from the home. If you have been contacted by CPS in Upland, understanding your legal rights as early as possible is essential. An experienced Upland CPS Lawyer can help protect your parental rights, respond to the investigation, and provide strategic representation throughout every stage of the juvenile dependency process.

What happens after someone reports you to CPS in Upland?

CPS Referral

When a report is made to Child Protective Services (CPS) involving a family in Upland, California, San Bernardino County Children and Family Services (CFS) will first review the CPS referral to determine whether the allegations require further action. Referrals may come from mandatory reporters, including teachers, doctors, nurses, therapists, law enforcement officers, or other professionals who are legally required to report suspected child abuse or neglect. Reports may also be submitted by relatives, neighbors, or other members of the public. Receiving a referral does not automatically mean the allegations are true or that your child will be removed from your care.

CPS Investigation, Interviews, and Home Visits

If the referral meets the legal criteria for investigation, a CPS investigation will be opened. During the investigation, a social worker may conduct interviews with the parents, the child, relatives, teachers, medical providers, or anyone else who may have relevant information about the child’s safety and well-being. In many cases, the social worker will also request a home visit to observe the living conditions, assess the child’s environment, and identify any immediate safety concerns. Parents should understand that statements made during the investigation may later become evidence if the matter proceeds to court, making it important to consult with an experienced Upland CPS Lawyer as early as possible.

CPS Safety Assessment

As part of the investigation, San Bernardino County CFS performs a safety assessment to determine whether the child faces an immediate or ongoing risk of abuse, neglect, or harm. The agency evaluates the specific allegations, the family’s circumstances, protective factors, and whether services or other interventions can safely address any concerns while allowing the child to remain at home. The results of the safety assessment often influence whether the investigation is closed, voluntary services are recommended, or the case is referred to the juvenile court.

Possible Outcomes of a CPS Investigation

A CPS investigation can have several possible outcomes. The referral may be determined to be unfounded or inconclusive and the case closed without further action. In other situations, San Bernardino County CFS may recommend voluntary services, implement a safety plan, or continue monitoring the family. If the Department believes the child cannot safely remain in the home, it may seek an emergency removal and file a petition in California Juvenile Dependency Court. Having an experienced Upland CPS Attorney involved early in the process can help protect your parental rights, respond to the allegations, and advocate for the best possible outcome for you and your family.

Can CPS Remove my child in Upland?

Emergency Child Removal by CPS

One of the most common questions parents ask is whether Child Protective Services (CPS) can remove their child without warning. In Upland, California, San Bernardino County Children and Family Services (CFS) has the authority to seek an emergency child removal when it believes a child faces an immediate risk of serious harm. Emergency removals generally occur when delaying action could place the child’s health or safety at substantial risk. Because the removal of a child is one of the most significant actions the government can take, California law imposes important legal safeguards and judicial oversight throughout the juvenile dependency process.

Protective Custody

When a child is removed from a parent’s care, the child is typically placed in protective custody pending further court proceedings. Protective custody does not terminate a parent’s rights or automatically mean the allegations have been proven. Instead, it is a temporary measure intended to protect the child while the court reviews the facts and determines whether continued out-of-home placement is legally justified. Shortly after a removal, the juvenile court generally conducts a detention hearing, where the Department must demonstrate that continued protective custody is warranted under California law.

Warrants and Immediate Removal

Under California law, CPS may remove a child pursuant to a protective custody warrant issued by the juvenile court or, in certain emergency circumstances authorized by statute, without first obtaining a warrant when immediate action is necessary to protect the child from serious harm. Whether a warrant is required depends on the specific facts and legal authority supporting the removal. If CPS removes a child, parents should promptly consult an experienced Upland CPS Lawyer to evaluate whether the removal complied with California law and to protect their rights throughout the dependency proceedings.

Imminent Danger and California Legal Standards

California’s juvenile dependency laws do not permit child removal simply because a better parenting decision could have been made or because concerns have been raised about a family’s circumstances. Generally, the Department must establish that the child faces a substantial risk of serious physical harm or illness under Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, and continued removal from a parent’s custody is governed by the standards set forth in Welfare and Institutions Code section 319 at the detention stage and section 361, subdivision (c) at disposition. Whether those legal standards have been satisfied depends on the specific facts of each case. An experienced Juvenile Dependency Attorney can challenge unsupported allegations, advocate for less restrictive alternatives, and work to protect your parental rights while pursuing the safe return of your child.

The Juvenile Dependency Court Process

Detention Hearing

If a child is removed by Child Protective Services (CPS) in Upland, the first court hearing is typically the detention hearing. The juvenile court determines whether the child should remain in protective custody or be safely returned to a parent while the case proceeds. Having an experienced Upland CPS Lawyer at this hearing can be critical to protecting your parental rights.

Jurisdiction Hearing

The jurisdiction hearing determines whether San Bernardino County Children and Family Services (CFS) has presented sufficient evidence to support the allegations contained in the dependency petition under Welfare and Institutions Code section 300. If the allegations are sustained, the court will assume jurisdiction over the child.

Disposition Hearing

At the disposition hearing, the court decides whether the child should remain in the home or be placed elsewhere while the case continues. The court may also order reunification services, visitation, counseling, parenting classes, substance abuse treatment, or other services designed to address the issues raised during the CPS investigation.

Six-Month Review Hearing

During the six-month review hearing, the juvenile court evaluates the parent’s progress with the court-ordered case plan. The court considers whether reunification services should continue, visitation should be expanded, or additional services are appropriate to facilitate a safe return home.

Twelve-Month Review Hearing

At the twelve-month review hearing, the court reviews the parent’s compliance, progress, and the child’s safety to determine whether reunification remains appropriate or whether another permanent plan should be considered.

Eighteen-Month Review Hearing

The eighteen-month review hearing is generally the final opportunity for reunification services. The court determines whether the child can safely return to the parent’s custody or whether the dependency case should proceed toward permanency.

Permanency Hearing

At the permanency hearing, often conducted under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26, the court selects a permanent plan for the child, which may include adoption, legal guardianship, or another permanent placement when reunification is no longer appropriate.

Termination of Parental Rights

If the court concludes that adoption is in the child’s best interests, it may order the termination of parental rights. Parents in Upland facing this stage of a CPS case should seek immediate representation from an experienced Upland Juvenile Dependency Attorney to protect their legal rights and advocate for the strongest possible outcome.

Common CPS Allegations in Upland

Physical Abuse – Welfare and Institutions Code § 300(a)

In Upland, San Bernardino County Children and Family Services (CFS) may investigate allegations of physical abuse when it believes a child has suffered, or is at substantial risk of suffering, serious physical harm inflicted non-accidentally by a parent or caregiver. These cases are generally brought under Welfare and Institutions Code section 300(a).

Neglect – Welfare and Institutions Code § 300(b)(1)

Allegations of child neglect often involve inadequate supervision, unsafe living conditions, medical neglect, educational neglect, or a parent’s inability to provide regular care. Neglect cases are commonly filed under Welfare and Institutions Code section 300(b)(1) when CFS believes a child’s health or safety is at substantial risk.

Domestic Violence – Welfare and Institutions Code § 300(b)(1)

Exposure to domestic violence may result in a CPS investigation if the Department believes the violence places a child at substantial risk of serious physical harm. These allegations are frequently alleged under Welfare and Institutions Code section 300(b)(1) and are evaluated based on the specific facts of each case.

Drug Use – Welfare and Institutions Code § 300(b)(1)

A parent’s drug use does not automatically justify court intervention. However, if illegal drug use or substance abuse creates a substantial risk to a child’s safety or well-being, San Bernardino County CFS may seek juvenile court involvement under section 300(b)(1).

Alcohol Abuse – Welfare and Institutions Code § 300(b)(1)

Similarly, alcohol abuse becomes a dependency issue when it allegedly affects a parent’s ability to safely supervise or care for a child. These allegations are also commonly filed under section 300(b)(1).

Mental Health – Welfare and Institutions Code § 300(b)(1)

A parent experiencing mental health challenges is not, by itself, grounds for a dependency case. The Department generally must show that the condition creates a substantial risk of harm to the child before proceeding under section 300(b)(1).

Failure to Protect – Welfare and Institutions Code § 300(b)(1)

Failure to protect allegations typically arise when CPS claims a parent knew or reasonably should have known of a danger to the child but failed to take reasonable protective action. These allegations are commonly pursued under section 300(b)(1).

Sexual Abuse Allegations – Welfare and Institutions Code § 300(d)

Allegations of sexual abuse are generally brought under Welfare and Institutions Code section 300(d) when a child is alleged to have been sexually abused or is at substantial risk of sexual abuse. These cases are among the most serious matters handled by the California Juvenile Dependency Court and require immediate legal representation from an experienced Upland CPS Lawyer.

Family Reunification

Family reunification is one of the primary goals of the California juvenile dependency system. When a child is removed from a parent’s care in Upland, the juvenile court may order family reunification services designed to address the concerns identified by San Bernardino County Children and Family Services (CFS) and to help parents safely reunify with their children. Every case is unique, and the specific services ordered by the court depend on the allegations contained in the dependency petition and the family’s individual circumstances.

Court-Ordered Case Plans

A case plan serves as the roadmap for reunification and outlines the services a parent must complete during the dependency case. Depending on the allegations, the case plan may require counseling, parenting education, substance abuse treatment, domestic violence programs, mental health services, or other rehabilitative services. Successfully completing the case plan can play an important role in demonstrating progress to the juvenile court.

Counseling and Parenting Programs

Many parents involved in Upland CPS cases are ordered to participate in individual counseling, family therapy, or other therapeutic services to address the issues that led to court involvement. The court may also require completion of parenting classes designed to strengthen parenting skills, improve communication, and promote a safe and stable home environment. Consistent participation and meaningful progress are often considered by the court when evaluating reunification.

Visitation with Your Child

Maintaining regular visitation is another important component of family reunification. Depending on the circumstances of the case, visits may begin as supervised and later progress to unsupervised visits, extended visits, overnight visitation, or ultimately the return of the child to the parent’s custody. The court reviews a parent’s progress throughout the dependency case when determining whether visitation should be liberalized.

At Shaw 3 Law Firm, we represent parents throughout Upland and San Bernardino County in every stage of the reunification process. An experienced Upland CPS Lawyer can help protect your parental rights, advocate for appropriate reunification services, seek expanded visitation, and work toward the safe return of your child whenever permitted under California law.

Relative Placement

When a child is removed from a parent’s custody during a Child Protective Services (CPS) case in Upland, California, the juvenile court and San Bernardino County Children and Family Services (CFS) may consider placing the child with a suitable family member or another qualified caregiver rather than in traditional foster care. California law recognizes that, when it is safe and appropriate, placement with individuals who have an established relationship with the child may help preserve family connections, maintain stability, and support the child’s emotional well-being throughout the juvenile dependency process.

Grandparent Placement

Grandparents are often among the first relatives considered for placement. Under Welfare and Institutions Code section 361.3, grandparents may receive preferential consideration when requesting placement, provided the placement is in the child’s best interests and the home satisfies applicable safety and approval requirements. The court considers numerous factors, including the child’s relationship with the grandparent, the ability to provide a safe and stable home, and the willingness to support family reunification when appropriate.

Relative Placement

California law also allows other relatives, including adult siblings, aunts, uncles, cousins, and other qualifying family members, to request placement of a child involved in a dependency case. San Bernardino County CFS evaluates each proposed placement by considering the child’s safety, the caregiver’s ability to meet the child’s needs, and the statutory factors set forth in Welfare and Institutions Code section 361.3.

Non-Relative Extended Family Members (NREFMs)

In appropriate cases, a child may also be placed with a Non-Relative Extended Family Member (NREFM)—an adult who has an established familial or mentoring relationship with the child, even though the individual is not related by blood or marriage. California law permits NREFM placements when the caregiver satisfies the required approval process and the placement serves the child’s best interests.

Placement Rights and Legal Representation

Although relatives and NREFMs may receive statutory consideration for placement, placement is not automatic. The juvenile court ultimately determines whether the requested placement is appropriate based on the child’s best interests and the evidence presented. At Shaw 3 Law Firm, we represent parents, grandparents, relatives, and prospective caregivers throughout Upland and San Bernardino County, advocating for lawful placement decisions and protecting the rights of families involved in California juvenile dependency proceedings.

Visitation Rights

Maintaining meaningful contact between parents and their children is an important part of the California juvenile dependency process. In Upland, the juvenile court determines the type and frequency of visitation based on the child’s safety, the parent’s progress, and the recommendations of San Bernardino County Children and Family Services (CFS). The court’s goal is to preserve and strengthen the parent-child relationship while ensuring that visits occur in a safe and appropriate environment.

Monitored Visitation

In many Upland CPS cases, visitation begins as monitored visitation, also referred to as supervised visitation. During these visits, another approved adult or agency monitor is present to observe the interaction between the parent and child. Monitored visitation is commonly ordered when the court believes supervision is necessary while the parent participates in court-ordered services or while the allegations in the dependency case are being addressed.

Unmonitored Visitation

As parents demonstrate progress by complying with their case plan, participating in services, and addressing the issues that brought the family before the juvenile court, the court may authorize unmonitored visitation. These visits allow parents to spend time with their children without a monitor present, providing greater opportunities to rebuild trust, strengthen family relationships, and demonstrate their ability to safely care for their children.

Overnight Visitation

When reunification continues to progress successfully, the juvenile court may approve overnight visitation. Overnight visits often represent an important step toward reunification because they allow the court and the Department to evaluate whether the child can safely transition back into the parent’s home. The court considers the child’s best interests, the parent’s progress, and the overall circumstances of the case before authorizing overnight visits.

Liberalization of Visitation

Throughout a dependency case, parents may request the liberalization of visitation, meaning a gradual expansion of parenting time as circumstances improve. Liberalization may include longer visits, unsupervised visitation, weekend visits, overnight visitation, or other increased contact. At Shaw 3 Law Firm, we represent parents throughout Upland and San Bernardino County, advocating for appropriate visitation orders and seeking expanded parenting time whenever the facts and California law support greater family reunification.

Why Hire Shaw 3 Law Firm

Choosing the right attorney can make a significant difference when facing a Child Protective Services (CPS) investigation or California juvenile dependency case. At Shaw 3 Law Firm, our practice is dedicated to representing parents, legal guardians, relatives, and caregivers involved in San Bernardino County CPS matters, including families in Upland, California. Rather than dividing our attention among many practice areas, we have developed substantial experience handling CPS investigations, emergency child removals, detention hearings, jurisdiction and disposition hearings, review hearings, relative placement disputes, visitation issues, and Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 petitions.

Experience and Focus

Attorney Walter Shaw has represented thousands of families throughout California juvenile dependency proceedings and has successfully obtained favorable outcomes in a wide variety of CPS matters. These include securing the return of children to their parents, obtaining court-ordered unsupervised visitation, defeating or narrowing dependency allegations, preserving reunification services, and successfully advocating for relative placement when supported by the facts and the law. Every case receives individualized attention because no two families or dependency cases are exactly alike.

Strategic Representation and Communication

Every CPS case begins with a carefully developed legal strategy. At Shaw 3 Law Firm, we work closely with our clients to explain the dependency process, review the Department’s allegations, identify legal and factual defenses, and prepare for every stage of the proceedings. We believe that consistent communication and client preparation are essential, allowing parents to make informed decisions while understanding their rights and responsibilities throughout the case.

Courtroom Advocacy

When litigation becomes necessary, Walter Shaw provides strong courtroom advocacy on behalf of parents and families in juvenile dependency court. Whether challenging emergency removals, contesting allegations at jurisdiction, seeking reunification services, requesting expanded visitation, or filing motions under the California Welfare and Institutions Code, Shaw 3 Law Firm is committed to protecting parental rights and pursuing the best possible outcome. Families throughout Upland and San Bernardino County turn to Shaw 3 Law Firm for experienced, strategic, and dedicated representation during some of the most important legal matters they will ever face.

Frequently Asked Questions

What should I do if CPS contacts me in Upland?

If San Bernardino County Children and Family Services (CFS) contacts you, remain calm and avoid making statements without first understanding your legal rights. Speaking with an experienced Upland CPS Lawyer early can help you navigate the investigation and protect your parental rights.

Can CPS remove my child without a court order?

In certain emergency situations, CPS may remove a child without first obtaining a court order if it believes the child is in immediate danger. However, the Department must promptly seek review by the juvenile court, where a judge will determine whether the removal was legally justified.

Do I have to let CPS into my home?

Generally, you are not required to allow CPS into your home without your consent or a valid court order, unless specific legal exceptions apply. Because every situation is different, you should consult a Juvenile Dependency Attorney before deciding how to respond.

Can CPS interview my child without my permission?

Depending on the circumstances, California law permits CPS to interview children during an investigation, including at school in certain situations. An experienced attorney can explain how these interviews may affect your case.

What happens after a CPS investigation?

After completing its investigation, San Bernardino County CFS may close the case, recommend voluntary services, implement a safety plan, or file a petition in California Juvenile Dependency Court if it believes court intervention is necessary.

How long does a CPS case usually last?

Every dependency case is unique. Some investigations are resolved within weeks, while juvenile dependency cases may continue for several months or longer depending on the allegations, court orders, and the parent’s progress with reunification services.

Can CPS remove my child because of marijuana use?

Not necessarily. Marijuana use alone does not automatically justify removing a child. The Department generally must demonstrate that a parent’s conduct creates a substantial risk to the child’s health or safety under California law.

Can grandparents or relatives obtain placement?

Yes. Grandparents, relatives, and certain Non-Relative Extended Family Members (NREFMs) may request placement during a dependency case. The juvenile court considers the child’s best interests and the placement factors set forth in Welfare and Institutions Code section 361.3.

What is a detention hearing?

A detention hearing is usually the first court hearing after a child has been removed. The juvenile court decides whether the child should remain in protective custody or be returned home while the dependency case proceeds.

What is a jurisdiction hearing?

During the jurisdiction hearing, the juvenile court determines whether the allegations in the dependency petition have been proven by the applicable legal standard. If the allegations are sustained, the case proceeds to disposition.

Can visitation become unsupervised?

Yes. As parents successfully complete court-ordered services and demonstrate progress, the juvenile court may expand visitation from monitored visits to unmonitored visits, overnight visitation, or ultimately reunification when appropriate.

What is a Section 388 Petition?

A Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 Petition allows a parent, relative, or other interested party to ask the juvenile court to modify a previous order based on changed circumstances or new evidence. These petitions are commonly used to request expanded visitation, reunification services, or the return of a child.

Do I need an attorney for a CPS investigation?

Although you may not be legally required to hire an attorney, having an experienced Upland CPS Lawyer involved early can help protect your constitutional rights, prepare you for interviews and court hearings, challenge unsupported allegations, and advocate for your family throughout the juvenile dependency process.

Contact an Upland CPS Lawyer Today

If you or a loved one is facing a CPS investigation, emergency child removal, or juvenile dependency case in Upland or anywhere in San Bernardino County, you do not have to navigate the process alone. The sooner you understand your rights and develop a legal strategy, the better positioned you may be to protect your relationship with your child. Shaw 3 Law Firm is dedicated to representing parents, relatives, and caregivers throughout every stage of the California juvenile dependency process. Contact Walter Shaw and Shaw 3 Law Firm today to schedule a confidential consultation with an experienced Upland CPS Lawyer and Juvenile Dependency Attorney and learn how we can help protect your parental rights and your family’s future.